The Theory Of Property :: essays research papers

The Theory of Property     While Websters New collegial Dictionary defines property as "somethingregarded as be possessed by, or at the disposal of, a person or group ofpersons species or class," (p. 1078) this definition hardly holds theconnotations so emphatically discussed by the anthropologist Morgan. To Morgan,"property has been so immense...so diversified its uses so expanding...that ithas become...an mutinous power." (p.561) Why has it become such anunmanageable power? Morgan answers this question with the simple answer that itis due to the linear developing of the loving existence of property from beingcollectively owned to being individually owned which has planted the seed of itsown destruction in modern society. Morgan, in an attempt to study the roleproperty has compete in shaping social structures byout history, hasconcluded that the influences property has had on reshaping societies and viceversa faecal matter t to each one t he historian some things about twain the society being studiedand the environment in which it strove to survive. To Morgan, the "germ" of theinstitution of property slowly infected many different societies in manydifferent parts of the world. His teleological approach states that due to the"unity of populace" various technological innovations, which gave rise to theever-growing availability of property, allowed social change to eliminate in many areas of the globe independently. Every area, went through its own variance ofevolution in which the importance of wealth grew at varying rates. This husking leads Morgan to believe that while the past was unified in itsvariation, it is the future which moldiness presently be addressed. For Morgan, instudying the past one digest learn much about the future. Not only does Morgananalyze the social emergence of various types of property, but he is alsoextremely elicit in the human tendencies evident in various societies w hichsurfaced as a result of the ever-growing list of ownable objects. As timeprogressed from the Status of Savagery through Barbarism and into Civilization sore wants and needs arose mostly due to new inventions. It is on thisrelationship between property, technology, and the human desire for more of eachwhich Morgan centers his work, and it is from this study which he hopes futuregenerations will learn how to improve their institutions until they can beimproved no more.     Morgan structures his essay around three prefatory "ethnical periods ofhuman progress" (p. 535) and the basic assumption that the more modes of take and subsistence there are the greater the proliferation of individualobjects of ownership. As technology advances and discoveries are made, theamount of ownable objects grow as does the need to own.